Comments

Sovereignty. Even before CCP officially recognized the first player alliances in the Exodus expansion of 2004, groups of players laid claim to the mysterious regions beyond Empire space. Since the earliest days of the game, laying claim to a system, or a constellation, or an entire region was seen as a sure fire way to generate content. After all, if you claim a part of the sandbox to build a castle, there’s always someone who wants to come knock yours down, and maybe put up their own. “Nice region, we’ll take it!” was the way of EVE, and planting your flag in the wilderlands of null sec was seen as the endgame for large scale PvP organizations.

Over time, the way sovereignty was claimed has gone through any number of changes. Generally, these changes have progressed as CCP has tried, with varying success, to create a rich playground for us all to play in. My intent is not to walk through this rich history. There are any number of resources out there for those interested in how sov has changed over time and who the main actors have been; Empires of Eve comes to mind. Instead, let’s look at where we are and where we might go.

After the advent of alliance blocs and the formation of the “Big Blue Donut”, many were clamoring for a change to sov that would revitalize null sec.  Some form of “occupancy sov” was generally regarded as an excellent step in this direction, a way to reward groups that actually used their space, while making it harder to hold great swaths of mostly empty null sec areas just because a group could. Enter the contentious Aegis Sovereignty system with the Carynx update. This was a quite drastic departure from the older Dominion sov model, and after over a year on the server its effects still cause argument, anger, disappointment and salty tears.

Through all that, though, there are a few points that it seems many in the community can agree on. The ADM system, linking vulnerability of your sovereignty to your alliance’s activity, seems a step in the right direction. Smaller groups have expanded and taken sov where previously they had little hope of engaging the various blocs. The move toward the defense of “nodes” had the promise of generating some dynamic fights, while the entosis system itself has been widely panned as antithetical to the sort of fleet battles null sec entities have grown accustomed too. And all through these arguments, you could hear the discussions and complaints about what sov was even good for in the first place; what advantage did owning sov really provide? In short, mixed results at best.

So, the question remains. What SHOULD sovereignty in EVE look like? What system would provide a backdrop for the kinds of grand player driven clashes that are synonymus with EVE, while also allowing for engaging day to day play for smaller groups and delivering an actual reason to own space and, presumably, be invested in its defense in the first place?

 What should sov in EVE look like?

 

Well, let us consider what truly owning space might look like. As capsuleers, we tend to fly through the systems of EVE, zipping from gate to gate (or lumbering, as the case may be) without really considering how truly massive each system really is. Think of all the resources that a star system harbors. If an alliance were truly going to claim and occupy a system, those resources would surely come into play. Right now, the resources of a system are used by the individual members of an alliance. Players rat to collect bounties and loot, mine to gather resources for sale or production, explore to harvest the materials found in relic and data sites, and engage in PI to produce a variety of materials. At both the individual and alliance level, you also have moon mining to gain useful resources and wealth. But is this all there is? What about all the other resources? What about the logistics to maintain all the infrastructure a budding empire needs? Surely we wouldn’t expect capsuleers to engage in the lower level drudge work of keeping all the internal supply lines of an empire functioning. We have better things to do, like enriching ourselves and heading out to knock over someone else’s sandcastle or stopping someone from knocking over ours.

Enter Backbone Logistics; a series of interconnected structures and functions that forms the base of an alliance’s claim to occupancy. First, let me offer a few example structures.

(disclaimer: I realize that I am discussing ideas that benefit sov null space only. It is not my intention to ignore all of the unique game play that low sec and wormhole space offer. This is merely a starting point for a conversation, and I welcome any discussion of how such concepts could be applied to these unique regions.)

Structures

Transshipment Hubs

could be scaled to some form of alliance level PI, but I’d be concerned that adding that in would be a needless tedium on long suffering alliance logistics. Let the hub do the work. These structures would be destructible, with no timer. The trick would be in the balance of EHP; enough so that a gang would be needed to efficiently engage it, while not enough to make a full fledged fleet a necessity. Perhaps even institute a damage cap, to try to avoid a larger fleet simply blapping it in a single pass. Simultaneously, these would be relatively inexpensive to buy, and not terribly difficult to transport and place using an indy ship.

Administration Control Centers

Every system an alliance owns would, as a matter of course, need some form of administration. A single ACC would need to be placed in each system claimed. Not only would this provide an administrative center for a system, but could also act as a collection point for the resources moved along by the Transshipment Hubs. These would also be destructible, though perhaps a timer would be in order in this case, and they would be a bit tougher than a transshipment hub.  I don’t suggest these structures be a replacement for ihubs, or even be necessary for claiming sov. Perhaps, for simplicity, a merging of the function of ACC and the Territorial Claim Unit could be considered. Regardless, the intention of the ACC is that it is merely needed if the alliance in question wished to fully utilize their space under the idea of Backbone Logistics.

Convoys

We’ve all seen NPC convoys in Empire space, quietly moving from station to station. Its a normal bit of backdrop. Well, materials collected by the alliance would have to move somehow, and the code for these already exists. Why not have NPC convoys that are attached to the sov owner move material from Transshipment Hubs to the Administrative Control Centers, and even through gates to other systems? Perhaps even have the convoys show up at stations and Citadels owned by the alliance, increasing the sense of an active, thriving economy. These would be targets for hostile players, who could act to disrupt the flow of goods within your empire by destroying these convoys. While there might not be bounty payoffs, killing the convoys would have an effect on the system of sov, and perhaps have them drop a mix of basic materials, some of which could be small enough and moderately lucrative enough to make killing them a least a bit worthwhile. At the same time, it might be interesting to consider arming these convoys, in a sense like the Q ships of old. Certainly not powerful enough to ward off a determined attack, but maybe enough to worry a lone frigate or destroyer. While introducing convoys to sov null space isn’t a new idea, my treatment of the concept is a bit different as described below.

Hauler

Follow that convoy!

Traffic Control Nodes

These are a bit more speculative. Nothing in the convoys, transshipment hubs, or administration control centers does much outside of structures and functions that already exist in game. This, however, is a bit different. My idea for the TCN’s is in part predicated on the notion that, at some point, local as we know it in null sec will be changed. This step isn’t necessary for the TCN’s to work, I suppose, but it would be much more effective, and this is a change that’s been clamored for nearly since the game started. TCN’s would be deployable at gates in systems an alliance controls. Unlike the other structures I mention, these would NOT be destructible, perhaps using a tethering mechanic, so long as an alliance held sov. The purpose of these nodes is intelligence gathering. The node would record and transmit information about what ships and/or pilots passed through the gate. Make it so the owner of the TCN can control what notifications they receive, based on a variety of criteria (numbers, ship classes, based on standings). Information could then be posted as an alert or email message to any in the alliance who are authorized to receive it.

Without a counter this could be overpowered. There should be no such thing as perfect intel, which is what we have now. So, to combat this, I’d suggest the following:

  1. There would be a delay before a ship or pilot is recorded and that information sent on. Not long, but even a 10 – 20 second delay would be enough time.
  2. The nodes are hackable. Using a data hacking module (or something else), a pilot entering the system tries to hack the node. If successful, the node (and any others perhaps?) doesn’t record the intrusion, or perhaps is delayed in sending intel. Perhaps make it so cov ops frigs and recons get the bonus of the delay period, and can then hack the node for their gang.
  3. Once hacked, a timer ensues that shows how long before the gang is reported, or how long before they’ll have to hack another node to keep the security system down.
  4. Easiest would be to make the hacking similar to what exists in game already. A more interesting prospect might be allowing the alliance to set up their own computer system, so hacking becomes sort of a blend between the PvE we have now, and playing a game of Mastermind with someone.

The TCN would introduce an element of choice to a roaming gang. Do you want to try a stealthy approach, risking possible discovery to get into a system unopposed? Or just accept the risk and charge in? The benefits for the sov holders are fairly obvious, but consider changes to things like the Rorqual. It is clear the intention is to get them into space and away from POS’. Perhaps a system like this provides SOME level of intel that the pilot can use to survive, but without 100% surety of survival. No reward without some risk.

Effects

So what would be the point of all this, beyond giving people something ELSE to shoot at? How could something like this maybe replace the entosis mechanic we have now? What is the benefit to sov owners?

Industry Bonuses

For quite some time people have discussed the viability of industry in null sec. The point remains that logistics for null sec empires relies heavily on jump freighters running back and forth to the main trade hubs of Empire space, since production is just as easy and more secure. There just isn’t much benefit to mass production in null sec, with the exception of super-capitals of course.

Now, there are changes on the way concerning industry in null sec, with new structures planned in the Upwell line. While we don’t yet have all the details, one effect of these suggestions of mine could be to lower the mineral build cost of items. After all, we have convoys, a logistics backbone, etc. It would be sensible that this system, built by the alliance, would benefit its members. And, of course, the more involved the system (and, of course, subsequent higher industry index in the ADMs) would increase this benefit. With items cheaper to build in nullsec, perhaps industry becomes more competitive and less reliant on those jump freighter logistics.

Vulnerability Timers

Currently, alliances set the period of their vulnerability when their systems and structures are open to an entosis attack. The vulnerability window, while perhaps sensible game play, feels a bit contrived. Why not find a way to keep that part of the system, but in a way that makes some sense?

Sov structures need a consistent flow of materials to be maintained, hence the Backbone Logistics that I’m proposing. I would suggest that the invulnerability to whatever capture mechanic is used (entosis or otherwise) stay up, regardless, provided the system is not under attack. However, if the backbone is broken to some extent (Transshipment Hubs destroyed, Admin Control Centers reinforced, convoys destroyed), it opens that vulnerability window up. This means you are only vulnerable when you actually are attacked. Now, a smart alliance logistician would keep stockpiles, in case of interruption, so the alliance still controls WHEN their window opens to coincide with their chosen time zone for defense. However, perhaps the LENGTH of that window can be modified by how much is destroyed by their attackers, modified by how many of the structures are replaced before the window opens (with some amount of lag to re-establish connections and convoy routes, etc). Once (and if) Citadels become attached to sov in some way, this mechanic could extend to them as well.

Conclusion

True occupancy sov should mean the building of actual empires out in the lanes of nullsec. A system like what I propose would, I think, allow for scaleable organization and help drive conflict while replacing the entosis system with something that can accomplish the same goal: nodes that break up fleets into smaller groups, but requiring attackers to bring enough firepower to allow for small gang fights as opposed to chasing lone ships using the mechanic for harassment. At the same time, by tying this to the vulnerability windows it sets the stage for the kinds of larger fleet fights many hope for, since holding sov would have a benefit to the holder (better industry and intel on top of the existing benefits to higher ADMs). There are, I’m sure, complexities that I’ve missed, but the hope is that SOME sort of system comes into play that makes people feel attached to their space again.

Thanks for reading.

445 Comments

  1. Hello there, I discovered your web site by the use of Google at the same time as looking for a related topic, your site came up, it seems to be great. I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

    November 10, 2018 at 21:27 Reply
  2. It¡¦s actually a nice and helpful piece of info. I¡¦m happy that you just shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

    November 10, 2018 at 21:27 Reply
  3. I’ve been browsing on-line more than 3 hours these days, but I by no means found any attention-grabbing article like yours. It¡¦s pretty worth sufficient for me. In my view, if all webmasters and bloggers made excellent content material as you did, the web can be a lot more useful than ever before.

    November 10, 2018 at 22:02 Reply
  4. But wanna state that this is very helpful , Thanks for taking your time to write this.

    November 10, 2018 at 23:42 Reply
  5. Keep functioning ,great job!

    November 11, 2018 at 01:17 Reply
  6. I think this is one of the most vital info for me. And i am glad reading your article. But want to remark on few general things, The website style is perfect, the articles is really great : D. Good job, cheers

    November 11, 2018 at 09:50 Reply
  7. I have learn a few good stuff here. Definitely value bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how a lot attempt you put to make such a magnificent informative website.

    November 11, 2018 at 12:21 Reply
  8. I truly wanted to write down a simple message so as to appreciate you for those awesome information you are giving out here. My incredibly long internet investigation has at the end been compensated with beneficial ideas to go over with my good friends. I would say that many of us visitors are unquestionably fortunate to be in a great network with so many perfect individuals with valuable basics. I feel quite happy to have encountered the weblog and look forward to really more amazing minutes reading here. Thanks once more for a lot of things.

    November 11, 2018 at 12:21 Reply
  9. I truly appreciate this post. I have been looking all over for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You have made my day! Thx again

    November 11, 2018 at 12:32 Reply
  10. Thanks for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do some research on this. We got a grab a book from our local library but I think I learned more from this post. I am very glad to see such great info being shared freely out there.

    November 11, 2018 at 12:33 Reply
  11. I enjoy you because of all your valuable work on this website. My mother really likes carrying out investigations and it’s really easy to see why. All of us know all relating to the dynamic ways you produce valuable things on the website and even improve contribution from website visitors about this concern while our favorite daughter is without question being taught a lot. Have fun with the remaining portion of the new year. Your doing a useful job.

    November 11, 2018 at 12:33 Reply
  12. This is really interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your excellent post. Also, I’ve shared your site in my social networks!

    November 11, 2018 at 21:37 Reply
  13. I went over this site and I conceive you have a lot of superb info, saved to favorites (:.

    November 12, 2018 at 07:11 Reply
  14. As soon as I discovered this website I went on reddit to share some of the love with them.

    November 13, 2018 at 00:47 Reply
  15. Magnificent goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you are just extremely magnificent. I really like what you’ve acquired here, certainly like what you’re saying and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to keep it smart. I can not wait to read far more from you. This is really a wonderful site.

    November 13, 2018 at 06:39 Reply
  16. Keep working ,impressive job!

    November 13, 2018 at 08:08 Reply
  17. Excellent beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your site, how could i subscribe for a blog web site? The account aided me a acceptable deal. I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered bright clear concept

    November 13, 2018 at 08:08 Reply
  18. you are truly a excellent webmaster. The web site loading speed is incredible. It seems that you are doing any unique trick. In addition, The contents are masterwork. you’ve performed a fantastic task on this topic!

    November 13, 2018 at 09:24 Reply
  19. You are a very capable individual!

    November 13, 2018 at 10:12 Reply
  20. Enjoyed reading through this, very good stuff, thanks . “All things are difficult before they are easy.” by John Norley.

    November 13, 2018 at 11:02 Reply
  21. Very well written information. It will be supportive to anyone who usess it, including yours truly :). Keep doing what you are doing – for sure i will check out more posts.

    November 13, 2018 at 20:44 Reply
  22. I needed to write you one very little note to be able to say thanks over again considering the pleasing techniques you have provided on this website. It was shockingly generous of people like you to supply easily what exactly many of us might have marketed for an electronic book in order to make some profit for themselves, most notably considering that you might well have tried it if you desired. The pointers additionally acted to be a fantastic way to be aware that some people have the identical dream similar to my very own to know the truth a whole lot more regarding this condition. I believe there are lots of more enjoyable sessions in the future for many who scan through your site.

    November 13, 2018 at 20:44 Reply
  23. Excellent web site. Plenty of useful information here. I am sending it to several buddies ans also sharing in delicious. And obviously, thanks for your sweat!

    November 13, 2018 at 20:53 Reply
  24. As a Newbie, I am constantly searching online for articles that can be of assistance to me. Thank you

    November 13, 2018 at 20:57 Reply
  25. Good ¡V I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your website. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs and related information ended up being truly easy to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it at all. Reasonably unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or anything, web site theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Excellent task..

    November 13, 2018 at 22:15 Reply
  26. There is clearly a lot to identify about this. I suppose you made some good points in features also.

    November 13, 2018 at 22:34 Reply
  27. Hello my loved one! I want to say that this post is amazing, nice written and include almost all important infos. I¡¦d like to look extra posts like this .

    November 14, 2018 at 10:08 Reply
  28. I think this is among the most important information for me. And i am glad reading your article. But wanna remark on some general things, The site style is wonderful, the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers

    November 14, 2018 at 16:27 Reply
  29. I would like to express my thanks to this writer for bailing me out of this particular predicament. After researching throughout the internet and getting principles that were not productive, I figured my entire life was done. Living devoid of the solutions to the problems you have fixed by means of your article is a serious case, as well as ones that might have in a wrong way affected my entire career if I had not come across your web blog. Your own personal training and kindness in playing with the whole thing was helpful. I don’t know what I would’ve done if I hadn’t discovered such a step like this. I can also now relish my future. Thanks so much for your high quality and results-oriented help. I won’t think twice to suggest your web page to anyone who wants and needs guidelines on this problem.

    November 14, 2018 at 21:03 Reply
  30. I precisely had to thank you so much yet again. I’m not certain the things that I could possibly have tried without the type of suggestions revealed by you on such a theme. It has been the frightening matter in my position, however , spending time with a new specialized fashion you treated the issue forced me to weep for happiness. I am grateful for the advice and expect you really know what an amazing job that you are carrying out instructing others through a blog. I am certain you’ve never come across all of us.

    November 14, 2018 at 21:03 Reply
  31. I was just searching for this info for a while. After six hours of continuous Googleing, at last I got it in your web site. I wonder what is the lack of Google strategy that don’t rank this kind of informative sites in top of the list. Generally the top web sites are full of garbage.

    November 14, 2018 at 21:03 Reply
  32. I am very happy to read this. This is the kind of manual that needs to be given and not the random misinformation that is at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this best doc.

    November 15, 2018 at 20:23 Reply
  33. I do agree with all the concepts you have offered for your post. They are really convincing and will certainly work. Nonetheless, the posts are too short for beginners. May just you please lengthen them a little from subsequent time? Thanks for the post.

    November 15, 2018 at 20:23 Reply
  34. I simply could not leave your website before suggesting that I actually enjoyed the usual info a person provide on your guests? Is going to be back steadily in order to inspect new posts

    November 15, 2018 at 20:44 Reply
  35. I have fun with, lead to I discovered just what I used to be having a look for. You have ended my four day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye

    November 15, 2018 at 21:17 Reply
  36. I have been browsing online more than three hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. Personally, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be much more useful than ever before.

    November 15, 2018 at 21:58 Reply
  37. We’re a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community. Your site provided us with valuable info to work on. You have done an impressive job and our whole community will be grateful to you.

    November 15, 2018 at 21:58 Reply
  38. I view something really special in this web site.

    November 16, 2018 at 05:52 Reply
  39. I¡¦ve been exploring for a little for any high quality articles or blog posts on this kind of space . Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled upon this web site. Studying this information So i¡¦m happy to exhibit that I have a very excellent uncanny feeling I discovered exactly what I needed. I most for sure will make sure to do not disregard this web site and provides it a glance on a constant basis.

    November 16, 2018 at 15:39 Reply
  40. Nice read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he just bought me lunch as I found it for him smile Thus let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch!

    November 16, 2018 at 17:34 Reply
  41. excellent issues altogether, you simply won a brand new reader. What would you suggest in regards to your submit that you simply made a few days in the past? Any sure?

    November 16, 2018 at 17:41 Reply
  42. Hey, I just started reading your blog – thank you for writing. As an FYI that it’s not displaying properly on the BlackBerry Browser (I have a Pearl). Anyway, I’m now subscribed to your RSS feed on my laptop, so thanks again!

    November 17, 2018 at 01:28 Reply
  43. I would like to get across my passion for your kind-heartedness giving support to people that really need help with this important area. Your personal dedication to passing the message around became rather powerful and has enabled folks just like me to achieve their objectives. This helpful tutorial signifies a lot to me and a whole lot more to my fellow workers. Thanks a lot; from all of us.

    November 17, 2018 at 03:00 Reply
  44. Lovely site! I am loving it!! Will come back again. I am bookmarking your feeds also

    November 17, 2018 at 03:00 Reply
  45. Great remarkable things here. I am very satisfied to peer your post. Thank you a lot and i am having a look ahead to contact you. Will you please drop me a mail?

    November 17, 2018 at 03:03 Reply

Leave a Reply