Comments

This post has the potential to be contentious. Ah well. As the poet said, if you’re not being criticized, you may not be doing much.

In my previous post, I talked very briefly about the need to always keep learning about EVE mechanics, which is mostly not a bad thing. Learning is always good, et cetera. But it does sometimes create unintended consequences, which when they are good CCP labels as “emergent game play” and when they are bad generally escalate into “EVE players are dumb” situations.

Much of this simultaneously comes from the fact of — and can be avoided through submitting to — the “science” of EVE. Very little about this game, after all, is art. In many ways, there are definite right and wrong ways to do things: much of EVE Online can be plotted on flow charts. There is a science to fitting a ship, and a science to flying it. There is a science to where this ship fits within a fleet, how that snippet of a fleet fits within a doctrine, and how that doctrine fits within a large multi-fleet armada common to sov warfare. There is a science to capturing a territory within either faction warfare or sovereignty warfare, and a science to defending it, and a science to how to conduct high-sec war declarations including short-cuts specific to all three kinds of play that experts will know how to use and novices will not.(1)

There is, in short, a science to everything in EVE.

And when players know how to use these things, we say they are “good at EVE” or “smart” and when players don’t know how to use these things, we say the opposite, including labeling them as “dumb” when the correct word is ignorant. It’s not that that they’re inherently stupid (usually), it’s simply that they are uneducated. The day they learn something new, the clock I talked about in the previous post resets and hopefully they won’t make that mistake again. Certainly, there are people in this game that insist on making the same mistakes over and over. But contrary to popular belief, many EVE players are actually pretty smart and if you explain the science of how something works to them, they’ll get it and they’ll follow it.

It’s just that in real-life science, things are documented. In EVE, the science of how to do complicated things are jealously guarded secrets used by the initiated against those who are not.

“You can affect something big, even if you’re small,” the old Goon propaganda poster promises. What it doesn’t tell you is that the knife cuts both ways. If you don’t understand the ship fitting or how to fly it, you will probably lose the ship. If you don’t understand how the fit works within a fleet or the fleet doctrine, you endanger the fleet and risk its destruction. If you don’t understand how the doctrine fits within the armada, you threaten the armada. If you don’t understand faction warfare mechanics or corp mechanics or sov mechanics… well, you potentially threaten the faction, the corp, or the alliance.

For every story of a hero newbie tackling a high value target, there’s another story of a newbie whose name is mud who bubbled a friendly capital or super-capital… or got an alliance’s wallet and assets stolen.

And when the newer player makes a mistake that affects something big, it’s never the newer player that pays the price. The new player loses a dictor. It’s the vets that trusted him that lose billions. Or hundreds of billions.

And when the newer player falls prey to the dark side of the science of EVE, we bitter-vets are always quick to throw out the “dumb” label: he was dumb to fly that ship, he was dumb to get into fleet without understanding what he was doing, he was dumb to mess with corp mechanics without understanding them, he was dumb to trust Scooter McCabe. And if all else fails, the bully’s accusation comes out, that the vet was dumb to trust the new player.

But was he dumb? Or merely uneducated?

And then we bemoan how few content creators — or “instigators” as CCP Seagull calls them — there are in this game. With so much science to learn and understand, and with the slightest mistake being picked up on and exploited, it doesn’t surprise me a single little bit that there are so few. Who wants to take that risk in such a risk averse game?

I suspect we lose a lot of EVE players and potential EVE players and a lot of potential content creators to the science of EVE.

(1) Examples: using SBUs to “blockade” your own space as a defensive measure, the old dec-shields used in high-sec, placing your ESS in a spot inaccessible to anything but a fleet, and other such tactics.

– Ripard Teg

If you would like to read more we invite you to visit his blog here.

1,278 Comments

  1. HighlyVery energeticdescriptive blogarticlepost, I enjoyedlikedloved that a lotbit. Will there be a part 2?

    July 20, 2019 at 09:28 Reply
  2. Keep up the wonderful piece of work, I read few blog posts on this web site and I conceive that your website is very interesting and has circles of good info .

    July 20, 2019 at 12:49 Reply
  3. I’m not sure where you’re getting your information, but great topic. I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more. Thanks for excellent information I was looking for this information for my mission.

    July 20, 2019 at 18:13 Reply
  4. I have been exploring for a little bit for any high quality articles or blog posts on this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled upon this site. Reading this info So i am happy to convey that I’ve a very good uncanny feeling I discovered exactly what I needed. I most certainly will make sure to don’t forget this site and give it a glance on a constant basis.

    July 20, 2019 at 23:11 Reply
  5. I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post…

    July 21, 2019 at 01:51 Reply
  6. I went over this site and I conceive you have a lot of fantastic info , saved to favorites (:.

    July 21, 2019 at 02:44 Reply
  7. Wow! This blog looks just like my old one! It’s on a entirely different subject but it has pretty much the same layout and design. Great choice of colors!

    July 21, 2019 at 06:55 Reply
  8. I have recently started a blog, the info you provide on this web site has helped me tremendously. Thank you for all of your time & work.

    July 21, 2019 at 07:43 Reply
  9. ExcellentTerrificWonderfulGoodGreatFantasticOutstandingExceptionalSuperb post buthowever ,however I was wonderingwanting to know if you could write a litte more on this topicsubject? I’d be very gratefulthankful if you could elaborate a little bit morefurther. ThanksBless youKudosAppreciate itCheersThank youMany thanks!

    July 21, 2019 at 09:39 Reply
  10. I discovered your blog website on google and examine a number of of your early posts. Continue to maintain up the very good operate. I simply extra up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. In search of ahead to studying extra from you afterward!…

    July 21, 2019 at 17:26 Reply
  11. Good info and straight to the point. I don’t know if this is really the best place to ask but do you guys have any thoughts on where to get some professional writers? Thanks 🙂
    eebest8 mmx

    July 21, 2019 at 19:04 Reply
  12. I really enjoy looking through on this site, it contains excellent content. “One should die proudly when it is no longer possible to live proudly.” by Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche.

    July 21, 2019 at 20:29 Reply
  13. My spouse and I absolutely love your blog and find most of your post’s to be exactly I’m looking for. Does one offer guest writers to write content to suit your needs? I wouldn’t mind creating a post or elaborating on a number of the subjects you write regarding here. Again, awesome web log!

    July 22, 2019 at 04:04 Reply
  14. As I site possessor I believe the content material here is rattling wonderful , appreciate it for your efforts. You should keep it up forever! Good Luck.

    July 22, 2019 at 04:58 Reply

Leave a Reply to minecraft Click here to cancel reply.