In my previous article, How a single click can destroy trillions, I talked about the recent coup/heist that Circle-Of-Two <CO2> was subjected to, and the damage it inflicted. If you haven’t read that article, you should consider doing so.

In this follow-up article, I would like to talk about some of the factors that make such a coup possible, and potential ways it could have been prevented. I would like to focus a little on the ways EVE Online limits options to rule alliances, and the vulnerabilities this system innately possesses. (note: I’m nowhere near a specialist on alliance management. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong about something).

Let us take a look at the way the CO2 alliance had set up its space empire, and the influence it had. At the moment of the coup, the CO2 alliance consisted of around 4000 pilots spread across 75 corporations. These corporations were all lead by their individual leaders, the CEOs. The direction of the alliance was determined by gigX (the head of the alliance), with the support of a small group of subleaders from different corporations. This is a fairly normal setup in most large corporations and alliances. The CEO is considered the most important player who can control all functions related to alliance management. The subleaders serve as backup leadership, to take away some of the CEO’s workload, or take over when he isn’t available. In large alliances, these subleaders are almost a necessity, as the amount of work it takes to run a large alliance is quite sizable. This is especially so if the CEO wants the occasional night’s rest. Normally, these subleaders can be appointed to perform specific tasks. The accountant (who has access to all corporation wallets, assets and can pay bills), Communications Officer (can modify messages of the day, and com channels), Diplomat (who manages the contact lists and the standings towards other alliances) and plenty of others. This allows subleaders to influence specific fields of work that they have been allocated. If a subleader is a ‘jack of all trades’ and seems trustworthy enough, the CEO can assign them the Director role, which means the player receives pretty much all other roles. In practice, this means he becomes equal in power to the CEO, having access to all functions and assets. The only exception to this is the inability to allocate or remove the role of director.

In the case of CO2, there was a small group of these directors, including The Judge (the man behind the coup). When the coup was executed, he used his leadership roles to steal valuables and change ownership of citadels. This may make you wonder: why did nobody stop him? Well that has everything to do with the efficiency of management in EVE. In our real world every large project takes time. A house changing ownership takes weeks, money transfers a few minutes, and unloading cargo takes hours. Looking at a real coup it usually takes several days to occupy essential buildings, assets and media channels. While in EVE, robbing an alliance blind is a matter of a few quick financial transactions and then clicking and dragging stacks of assets to your personal hangar. They are hardly time-consuming actions. If any of the ‘subleaders’ would have been aware the heist was in progress, they would only have a few seconds/minutes for damage-control (safe assets that weren’t stolen yet). The only one who could have truly stop the process was gigX, with the power to remove The Judge’s director-role. But at the moment of the coup, he was asleep. This gave the thief the few moments of free reign he needed.

Another thing in favor of The Judge was the allocation of structures in CO2 space. In some alliances, individual corporations are allowed to deploy and manage their own citadels and stations. This allows them to freely run their business, independent of alliance leadership, resulting in an area of space where the structures are owned by dozens of different entities, all under the umbrella of the alliance. The problem of such a system is, that if one of these corporations ‘goes rogue’, the alliance could lose stations and citadels. Each individual corporation leader could compromise the safety of the entire region. To counteract this risk, the CO2 alliance gave the ownership of all structures to one corporation: the executor corp, SRBI Holding, which was owned by gigX himself. By doing this, the security of the space-stations didn’t rely on the whims of dozens of corporation CEOs, but on a small group of directors that where selected for the job. This system is effective, for the most part. However, the major problem lies on who/how the alliance leader places trust. The Judge had earned gigX’s trust after more than 5 years of co-operation and friendship. In hindsight, however, this trust was poorly placed. It was essential to the fact that he was able to abuse his power, without being reigned in. In the end, a misplaced sense of trustworthiness gave an ill-willed person access to everything he could dream of, allowing him to pull of one of the greatest heists in EVE’s history.

Of course, many other factors made this coup so effective, but we will not be looking at them in this article. Here are some items that crossed my mind.

There are not many ways to set up an alliance’s leadership in EVE. You could basically look at leaderships of alliances as a dictatorial system. There is a single almighty person, who controls all the power, and can make decisions as he pleases. The addition of alliance directors only serve as ‘additional almighties’ that are supposed to cooperate. But as current events show, there is nothing stopping them if they don’t wish to toe the line. In the real world, most countries have recognized that such a method of government isn’t desirable. Dividing the power is essential to keep the ruling class in check. Many of those governments added filters to keep the nation out of trouble. A congress, senate or similar institution has the simple function to make-up/aprove good plans and block the bad ones.  These systems make sure that a single nutjob’s bad ideas can’t do too much harm. Unfortunately, in EVE online there is no option to add such filters, never mind install a fully functional democracy. Of course a good chat among leaders can sort out some stuff, or a ‘straw poll’ among members can work as a referendum. I could add several pages about the hundreds of different ways real-life corporations and countries are run which would be better/safer than the current system in EVE. Given that CCP doesn’t give us any options to apply them, I feel talking about them would be a waste of time. In EVE we always end up with a single person being able to push the buttons, thus overriding any democratic decision-making.

With that in mind, I’ll speculate a little about some other methods to limit a single person’s power within an alliance in EVE. If a person chooses to ‘go bad’ it would be safer to control the amount of influence he/she has. The main risk-factor is in the director role. If an alliance CEO would only give each leader 1-2 functions, there would only be 1-2 leadership aspects at risk with any one leader. For example: if the Judge would only have had the accountant role, he would have been able to steal a trillion in ISK and assets, but wouldn’t have been able to transfer the citadels. That would still be a harsh loss, but not nearly as bad. The problem with this is obvious; if a leader has only 1-2 functions, there need to be more leaders appointed, who may not be available. additionally, more security treats are introduced as the pool of leaders with access increases.

In the CO2 heist, all valuables where located in a single citadel (the Keepstar in 68FT). The Judge could take control of this citadel, and by transferring the ownership this station he cut all pilots off from their assets. A high-impact move. With a little more investment of ISK and time, it would be possible to setup a group of citadels, which would allow splitting of ship-caches and inhabitants, thereby spreading risk. In order to keep these citadels safe, they would need to be controlled by multiple different people. If one of the responsible leaders rebelled, there would still be a few other citadels with a good supply of ships and pilots. As mentioned before, with this solution the amount of players that need to be trusted grows, which is itself a security risk.

Over a trillion in assets and ISK in a single place, accessible to multiple persons. Now that’s like throwing a steak in a dog-pen and telling them in a stern, command voice to “stay”. They may be the most loyal dogs in the world, but eventually one them will take a bite, and who can blame them when they do? On how many occasions would a director actually need access to such an amount of wealth. To me the obvious solution would be to lock some of that money away, for example in the CEO-wallet. If somebody is ill-willed, they would only be able to access the limited amount in the alliance’s wallet. With hard assets this is more difficult to achieve but is not impossible. This would have limited the theft to a certain extent.

As you’ve probably understood from my ranting above I cannot give you a real solution to protect an alliance from an ‘inside job’, I can only provide some ideas. The work of managing a large alliance is just too large for a single person. Work needs to be divided in order to manage, and the only basis for doing so is trust. As recent events show, trusting somebody doesn’t make them worthy of that trust. This makes it hard to choose who should receive power within an alliance. If many people are given a limited amount of power, there are a lot of smaller security risks. If a few people are given large amounts of power, the alliance is at risk of a major sabotage. Neither of which is preferable. More stable ways to divide power are simply not supported by the game – CCP, please consider this. With my limited insights, without CCP’s involvement I don’t see a reasonable solution to this conundrum.

Do you have any ideas about alliance security? How is your alliance setup? Leave a comment if you have a good idea. Maybe together we can find a better solution that could benefit us all.

282 Comments

  1. I have read several excellent stuff here. Definitely value bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how so much attempt you put to create this type of excellent informative web site.

    October 17, 2018 at 01:23 Reply
  2. What i don’t understood is actually how you are now not actually a lot more neatly-appreciated than you may be now. You are so intelligent. You recognize thus considerably on the subject of this subject, made me personally believe it from a lot of numerous angles. Its like men and women are not fascinated unless it¡¦s something to do with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs excellent. Always handle it up!

    October 17, 2018 at 01:23 Reply
  3. I¡¦ve been exploring for a little bit for any high-quality articles or blog posts on this kind of space . Exploring in Yahoo I ultimately stumbled upon this site. Reading this info So i¡¦m glad to show that I have a very excellent uncanny feeling I discovered just what I needed. I such a lot definitely will make sure to don¡¦t overlook this site and give it a glance on a constant basis.

    October 17, 2018 at 01:23 Reply
  4. Hello. splendid job. I did not expect this. This is a splendid story. Thanks!

    October 17, 2018 at 01:26 Reply
  5. I conceive you have mentioned some very interesting details , thanks for the post.

    October 17, 2018 at 15:02 Reply
  6. Thank you for the sensible critique. Me & my neighbor were just preparing to do a little research about this. We got a grab a book from our area library but I think I learned more clear from this post. I am very glad to see such magnificent information being shared freely out there.

    October 17, 2018 at 22:55 Reply
  7. Hi there everybody, here every person is sharing these kinds of experience, therefore it’s
    good to read this web site, and I used to pay a quick visit this website everyday.

    October 18, 2018 at 17:39 Reply
  8. Hey there, You have done a fantastic job. I will certainly digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I am sure they will be benefited from this web site.

    October 18, 2018 at 23:13 Reply
  9. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

    October 19, 2018 at 07:21 Reply
  10. Thank you for the good writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it. Look advanced to more added agreeable from you! However, how can we communicate?

    October 19, 2018 at 09:51 Reply
  11. I like what you guys are up too. Such intelligent work and reporting! Keep up the excellent works guys I¡¦ve incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it’ll improve the value of my site 🙂

    October 19, 2018 at 11:50 Reply
  12. I got what you mean , thanks for putting up.Woh I am thankful to find this website through google. “Those who corrupt the public mind are just as evil as those who steal from the public.” by Theodor Wiesengrund Adorno.

    October 19, 2018 at 19:01 Reply
  13. You made some nice points there. I looked on the internet for the issue and found most guys will go along with with your blog.

    October 19, 2018 at 19:12 Reply
  14. Hiya, I am really glad I have found this information. Nowadays bloggers publish only about gossips and web and this is actually irritating. A good site with exciting content, this is what I need. Thank you for keeping this site, I will be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Can not find it.

    October 19, 2018 at 19:12 Reply
  15. Hi my friend! I want to say that this article is awesome, nice written and come with almost all vital infos. I would like to peer extra posts like this .

    October 19, 2018 at 19:30 Reply
  16. Hi my friend! I wish to say that this article is awesome, great written and come with approximately all important infos. I¡¦d like to peer extra posts like this .

    October 19, 2018 at 19:48 Reply
  17. Thanks for any other great article. Where else may just anyone get that type of info in such an ideal means of writing? I’ve a presentation subsequent week, and I am on the look for such info.

    October 19, 2018 at 20:20 Reply
  18. Hello. splendid job. I did not anticipate this. This is a splendid story. Thanks!

    October 19, 2018 at 20:30 Reply
  19. As a Newbie, I am permanently browsing online for articles that can be of assistance to me. Thank you

    October 19, 2018 at 21:31 Reply
  20. I dugg some of you post as I cerebrated they were extremely helpful handy

    October 20, 2018 at 05:40 Reply
  21. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

    October 20, 2018 at 11:57 Reply
  22. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

    October 20, 2018 at 12:29 Reply
  23. If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

    October 20, 2018 at 14:24 Reply
  24. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

    October 20, 2018 at 16:46 Reply
  25. If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

    October 20, 2018 at 17:21 Reply
  26. Great work! That is the type of info that are supposed to be shared around the web. Shame on the search engines for not positioning this post higher! Come on over and discuss with my website . Thank you =)

    October 20, 2018 at 19:03 Reply
  27. Wow, incredible blog layout! How lengthy have you ever been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The full look of your web site is fantastic, let alone the content material!

    October 20, 2018 at 19:03 Reply
  28. Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

    October 20, 2018 at 19:08 Reply
  29. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

    October 20, 2018 at 19:46 Reply
  30. Good write-up, I¡¦m normal visitor of one¡¦s blog, maintain up the nice operate, and It’s going to be a regular visitor for a long time.

    October 20, 2018 at 19:51 Reply
  31. Useful information. Fortunate me I discovered your web site accidentally, and I’m shocked why this accident didn’t came about in advance! I bookmarked it.

    October 20, 2018 at 19:55 Reply
  32. The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

    October 20, 2018 at 21:29 Reply

Leave a Reply