A staff officer is someone who works within a military headquarters, usually within a specific department, with the intention of supporting commanders in various ways. Whilst large alliances, and coalitions, have a lot of parallels to real-life structures, they lack staff officers. I think that this reduces the operational capacity of EVE alliances, and is an opportunity for reform.

History of Military Command Structures in EVE

Before making a case for reform, it is constructive to look at the history of how military forces in EVE have been commanded. In the first few months and years, there was no real military command structure. The conflict was purely tribal in character, where individual fleet commanders would rally a group of people to accomplish some form of objective.

Over time, a degree of formal military command on the strategic level began to emerge. Corporation and alliance CEOs determined specific military objectives, and FCs carried it out. However, operational command remained deeply limited. Coordination of multiple fleets was rare and relatively difficult. Intelligence was handled on an ad-hoc basis, with individual relationships and connections having more prominence than institutional capacity.

This focus on the strategic level of command eventually crystallized in the position of the Skymarshal. This is a single person who acts as a sort of supreme commander for all military activities within a given alliance or coalition. They coordinate with diplomats, logicians and alliance leadership to draw up war plans and assign FCs to specific targets. This was the command model which served in the later phase of the 2007-2009 Great War.

However, by mid-2011 or so – varying in terms of geography – this model began to come under strain. Campaigns in Dominion sovereignty were so complicated and multifaceted that a single person could not reliably conduct all planning and prioritization for anything other than a very short action. Moreover, as alliances expanded out to muster significant forces in multiple time-zones, a single Skymarshal was no longer viable. One person could not coordinate operations at all times. The drubbing which Goonswarm received in the AUTZ in their adventure in Tribute is indicative of this issue.

Therefore, alliances moved to a Skyteam. This is a relatively small group – perhaps up to 15 – senior FCs with a great deal of experience. This is the model currently used by the vast majority of organizations in the game. It splits some of the burdens of command operations and makes it possible for talented FCs to rise up the ranks to a position of overall command and responsibility.

However, I believe that this model is somewhat flawed, and could be replaced.

A Real Life Interlude

I was talking with an acquaintance about the Goons’ deployment to the north in August, and he remarked with some wonderment, “They’re fighting wars larger than most of Europe since WW2”. This stopped and made me think about the issue. Even setting aside the Goons, whose immense size is something of an outlier, just a normal alliance deployment might see somewhere in the region of 4000 people engaging.

In real life, that’s about the size of a Brigade Combat Team in the US Army. A BCT has about 300 people in a headquarters role, spread across a number of dedicated headquarters companies. Whilst many of the functions of a headquarters in real life doesn’t really map over to EVE – you don’t really need a chaplain or legal advisor, for example – there are still a large number of roles which are relegated to a small group of FCs.

What am I suggesting?

Therefore, it is my proposal that to improve the capacity of military command teams, we should replace the Skyteam was a dedicated military staff supporting commanders. This is for two key reasons.

The first is that the skills of an FC do not directly map to strategic command. This is not in any way meant to disparage the FCs who currently run campaigns – many of them are professional and highly competent individuals. However, at the strategic level, there are a lot of other factors to consider; diplomacy, logistics, human intelligence, reconnaissance and the media meta-game to name but a few.

Being an FC, even a really good FC, does not necessarily prepare you to address these challenges. Having a dedicated staff who can specialize makes up for any deficiencies in the experience set of a specific commander.

The second is that a member of a Skyteam has a huge amount of weight on the shoulders. They have to make military decisions, but they also have to keep an eye on every other factor which might affect the campaigns they conduct. This places a great deal of stress upon them, and it can lead to mistakes. For example, at BR-5RB, NC/PL made the judgment that their USTZ pilots would log in to save them – and paid the price for their mistake to the tune of 8.76 trillion ISK. A military analysis staff might have prevented this misjudgment from happening.


Setting aside the fact that I have never held any command position of any note – which might perhaps disqualify me from serious commentary on strategic warfare – there are three key challenges with a ‘staff officer’ plan.

Firstly, it requires many more people to be involved in the military planning. This presumably poses something of a problem in terms of enemy intelligence efforts. This might be countered by strict compartmentalization of information, but that could, in turn, impede interdepartmental cooperation and slow things down even more. Resolving this challenge sounds like a minutiae heavy task which I can’t comment upon – though it must be noted that in real life, military forces manage to deal with this problem.

Secondly, it runs the risk of slowing things down by having too many people as part of the decision-making process. In the current model, you plan with a handful of people who you know well. Moving that to a more staff focused approach might impede progress. To resolve this challenge, I would advocate for an approach wherein decision making is kept to a handful of people – key commanders, maybe an intelligence and diplomatic liaison. Everyone else is given things to do and gets them done without having to know why.

Lastly, we run into the fact that real life staff officers are paid for their time. A commander can be reasonably confident that they can rely on staff to get things done. In EVE, this is not always the case. If your military analyst for Fountain has a bad cold and doesn’t feel like talking EVE, then that would be a serious problem. In a Skyteam structure, you don’t need lots of people around to do jobs. This challenge might be resolved by making sure that staff are not hyper-specialized, and having regular cross-briefing so if one person isn’t around, a crucial component of the system doesn’t fall apart.


I have no specific credentials in-game for command. I am, at best, an enthusiastic amateur when it comes to military history and science. However, I do think that a staff structure of some form might improve the combat capabilities for groups around New Eden and that the gravitas of EVE conflict might be best matched by staff structures.


Featured image credit: Razorien


  1. I am continuously browsing online for ideas that can benefit me. Thank you!

    December 6, 2018 at 11:14 Reply
  2. There is clearly a bundle to identify about this. I think you made certain good points in features also.

    December 6, 2018 at 11:15 Reply
  3. As I web site possessor I believe the content matter here is rattling wonderful , appreciate it for your hard work. You should keep it up forever! Best of luck.

    December 6, 2018 at 11:23 Reply
  4. I was just seeking this info for a while. After six hours of continuous Googleing, finally I got it in your web site. I wonder what’s the lack of Google strategy that don’t rank this kind of informative websites in top of the list. Usually the top websites are full of garbage.

    December 6, 2018 at 11:23 Reply
  5. Very informative blog article.Much thanks again. Will read on…

    December 6, 2018 at 19:20 Reply
  6. Very good article. I absolutely appreciate this site.

    December 7, 2018 at 06:14 Reply
  7. I loved your article post.Really thank you! Really Great.

    December 8, 2018 at 17:59 Reply
  8. excellent publish, very informative. I ponder why the opposite experts of this sector do not notice this. You should continue your writing. I’m sure, you’ve a huge readers’ base already!

    December 9, 2018 at 08:26 Reply
  9. Great tremendous issues here. I am very glad to look your article. Thanks so much and i am taking a look forward to touch you. Will you kindly drop me a e-mail?

    December 9, 2018 at 08:26 Reply
  10. Magnificent beat ! I would like to apprentice while you amend your site, how could i subscribe for a blog web site? The account aided me a acceptable deal. I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear concept

    December 9, 2018 at 08:28 Reply
  11. Heya i’m for the first time here. I came across this board and I find It really useful & it helped me out much. I hope to give something back and help others like you helped me.

    December 9, 2018 at 08:30 Reply
  12. This is very interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger. I’ve joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your excellent post. Also, I’ve shared your website in my social networks!

    December 9, 2018 at 08:36 Reply
  13. I value the post.

    December 10, 2018 at 02:13 Reply
  14. Appreciate you sharing, great blog article.Much thanks again. Fantastic.

    December 10, 2018 at 08:30 Reply
  15. Wow, great article post.Really thank you! Much obliged.

    December 10, 2018 at 13:01 Reply
  16. Magnificent goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just extremely excellent. I actually like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you are stating and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to keep it sensible. I can not wait to read far more from you. This is actually a tremendous web site.

    December 10, 2018 at 18:01 Reply
  17. I was just seeking this information for some time. After six hours of continuous Googleing, at last I got it in your web site. I wonder what is the lack of Google strategy that don’t rank this kind of informative websites in top of the list. Generally the top sites are full of garbage.

    December 10, 2018 at 23:15 Reply
  18. Heya i am for the first time here. I found this board and I find It really useful & it helped me out much. I hope to give something back and help others like you helped me.

    December 11, 2018 at 01:16 Reply
  19. Wow, fantastic weblog format! How lengthy have you been running a blog for? you made running a blog glance easy. The whole look of your web site is wonderful, as smartly as the content!

    December 13, 2018 at 03:55 Reply
  20. You are a very capable individual!

    December 13, 2018 at 03:55 Reply
  21. Great write-up, I¡¦m normal visitor of one¡¦s website, maintain up the excellent operate, and It’s going to be a regular visitor for a lengthy time.

    December 13, 2018 at 04:05 Reply
  22. A lot of thanks for your whole labor on this website. My mom really likes working on research and it’s obvious why. A lot of people hear all about the compelling mode you offer priceless tricks through the website and therefore inspire response from some others about this article so our own child is always starting to learn a whole lot. Take advantage of the rest of the year. You are always performing a fantastic job.

    December 13, 2018 at 04:05 Reply
  23. Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again soon!

    December 13, 2018 at 04:13 Reply
  24. I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an nervousness over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again as exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this hike.

    December 13, 2018 at 12:07 Reply
  25. I truly appreciate this post. I¡¦ve been looking everywhere for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You’ve made my day! Thank you again

    December 15, 2018 at 04:09 Reply
  26. Normally I do not read article on blogs, but I would like to say that this write-up very pressured me to take a look at and do it! Your writing style has been surprised me. Thank you, very great article.

    December 15, 2018 at 05:40 Reply
  27. Very neat blog. Will read on…

    December 15, 2018 at 22:04 Reply
  28. What’s up to all, how is all, I think every one is getting more
    from this website, and your views are nice in support
    of new users.

    December 16, 2018 at 03:40 Reply
  29. Thanks very nice blog!

    December 16, 2018 at 07:05 Reply
  30. Good way of explaining, and nice article to take data on the topic of my presentation focus, which i am
    going to present in college.

    December 16, 2018 at 09:20 Reply
  31. Hey there! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you if
    that would be ok. I’m definitely enjoying your blog and look forward to new posts.

    December 16, 2018 at 11:37 Reply
  32. After I originally commented I appear to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments
    are added- checkbox and now every time a comment is added
    I recieve four emails with the exact same comment. Is there a way you can remove me from that service?
    Many thanks!

    December 16, 2018 at 13:31 Reply
  33. Thanks for sharing your thoughts about brazilian wax meme.

    December 16, 2018 at 14:45 Reply
  34. Having read this I thought it was very enlightening. I appreciate
    you finding the time and energy to put this informative
    article together. I once again find myself spending
    a lot of time both reading and leaving comments.
    But so what, it was still worth it!

    December 16, 2018 at 15:10 Reply
  35. What a stuff of un-ambiguity and preserveness of precious
    experience on the topic of unexpected emotions.

    December 16, 2018 at 18:22 Reply
  36. yxEN9O Very nice write-up. I absolutely love this site. Continue the good work!

    December 17, 2018 at 04:55 Reply
  37. Appreciate the recommendation. Let me try it out.

    December 17, 2018 at 23:35 Reply
  38. Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog article.Thanks Again. Will read on…

    December 18, 2018 at 07:36 Reply
  39. I loved your article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.

    December 18, 2018 at 13:42 Reply
  40. Greate pieces. Keep posting such kind of information on your site.
    Im really impressed by it.
    Hey there, You have done a great job. I’ll definitely digg it
    and in my view suggest to my friends. I am sure they’ll be benefited from this
    web site.

    December 18, 2018 at 15:31 Reply
  41. Really informative article post.Much thanks again. Fantastic.

    December 18, 2018 at 18:59 Reply

Leave a Reply