The meta is an abbreviation of most effective tactics available. In gaming, it usually refers to ships, items or strategies that have proven to be powerful, and thus many people want to use.

Why are things the way they are, and how has it come to his? These are questions that many of us never bother to ask ourselves. Despite this, it can be quite educational to think about how things became the way they are today, this can teach us about past mistake, and keep us from making future ones. In Eve the term meta also refers to the current political landscape. I’d like to iterate that I am not referring to this kind of meta, in this article.

In EVE the ship-meta has led us to a situation where large fleets of Battleships and T3 cruisers battle it out in nullsec. While in many smaller scale combat situations take place in smaller ships like in lowsec and nullsec. In this article, I’ll take a closer look at why this division came to be. Why are the large and powerful ships favored in large fleet battles and why do players prefer the faster ships for small skirmishes? Of course, the value of the ships and the willingness of players to risk more valuable ships is an important factor I’m not going to discuss too extensively, as it’s more of a personal thing as to what what a player believes to be expensive. Instead let’s take a closer look at two ship types, their strengths, and weaknesses and think about how these tailor to a specific setup. I’ll focus on battleships and frigates, as these ships differ the most in their stats, and make an interesting comparison.

Frigates are fast and affordable. They have the speed to get into the fight quickly, do their thing, and when they eventually get lost, be replaced easily. Looking at frigate fights in a 1v1 setting, there is usually a brief chase in which the contestants try to catch the enemy (or get the hell out) and maneuver their ships into their optimal range. When the shooting starts the fights are usually over very quickly. In my experience within the first 30 seconds after they start (some exceptions).

But what makes frigate fights so fast? It has everything to do with the statistic lines of frigates. Looking at T1 ships, they often have between 125 and 175 Damage/second (DPS after this point), and the effective EHP of frigates is relatively low. Normally most fittings fall somewhere between 2500 and 7500 EHP. If these ships are pitted against one another, you will realize why frigate PVP is so fast. With 175 DPS, it takes only 15 seconds to chew through 2500 EHP. And even with the lower  125 DPS, you can destroy a fairly tanky 7500 EHP frigate in only 60 seconds. Especially now that people prefer high damage setup over the high tank versions. Of course, good damage mitigation and suboptimal ranges could make the battle last a little longer, but in general, the fights will still be over quite fast. When looking at the balance between damage and tank, it’s interesting to calculate a ratio. With an average of 150 DPS and 5000 EHP, the tank/damage ratio is 33:1, an average number.

Now let’s look at battleships. Battleships the biggest ships many people will ever fly (Many people never access capitals, but the story is similar). Battleships are expensive but have a good damage potential,  more importantly, they are very hard to kill. A fitted T1 battleship has a damage capability somewhere between 500 and 1000 DPS. The tank depends on the fitting but commonly falls between 75 and 125.000 EHP. Taking an average of 750 damage and 100,000 EHP into account, that would leave us with a tank/damage ratio of 133:1, a very high number, compared to the 33:1 of the frigate level. Pitting two  battleships against each other, it would take them over 2 minutes (133 seconds to be exact) to break one another

Comparing the two ratio’s you will see that the larger ship type has a relatively high defensive stats and relatively low damage output. The smaller frigates are just the opposite. You could find this pattern in all different ship classes, bigger ships get an increase in damage but a bigger increase in defense. Their damage doesn’t scale as impressively as their tank. This generally means that fights between larger ships take longer than smaller ships, simply because it takes them longer to chew through that HP-buffer.

Looking at fleet combats many things favor the slow and steady approach that battleship brings, most importantly the ‘delay’. There is usually a time-delay of 5-10 seconds between the fleet commander landing on the grid, and the fleet reacting to his first orders. Caused by normal personal reaction times and assessment of the situation. This could lead to people getting ‘left behind’. In a slow battleship fleet, the usual range someone could fall is 5-10 km behind the group. With a frigate fleet, moving at 3000 m/s a small time delay may result in a distance over 50 km. That could result in the stragglers being caught and being out of repair-range of their logistics. High-speed frigate-fleets are a lot harder to command and control. Many frigate FC’s start their fleets with comments like: “I’ll tell you where to go, but you are the one flying your ship, be smart” for this reason.
A similar delay in shows up with logistics. It takes time for logistics pilots to find a damaged ship, lock it and start their repair cycles. With a battleship, the 100,000 EHP buffer, gives the logistics some time to save it (unless the enemy fleet can one-shot them). With a 5000 HP frigate, the help will often arrive too late, especially if multiple ships start shooting it (have you ever tried keeping a large fleet of 3000 m/s frigates in logistics range?). It just doesn’t work very well. When taking the above into account, you’ll see that the relatively high HP and slow speeds on battleships are advantageous in keeping them alive and coordinating fleet movements. While many FCs find frigate fleets uncontrollable due to the speed.

In solo-fights, on the other hand, there is no delay between commands, no logistics, and allies to anchor up. These fights are more focussed on the pilot’s own wits and skills. And thus slowing the fight to a controllable speed is less of an issue, the ratio’s of tank/damage is less of a factor. Instead, a pilot would prefer an engageable ship (A ship that people are willing to fight), that is able to escape when in trouble (unless you like being outnumbered 20 to 1, in which case you can take a battleship just fine) and is quick enough to catch targets before they flee. Preferably all of the previously mentioned. With this in mind, smaller ships like frigates, destroyers, and fast cruisers are better suited. Of course, a ship with high damage and tanks has an advantage, it enables the pilot to kill more targets, but the balance between the two is more skewed in favor of damage output. Ships with high DPS are favorable, as they allow the pilot to take an enemy out before help arrives.

In nullsec, PVP battles there many non-battleship fleets. Namely T3 cruiser or destroyer fleets and or even caracal fleets. You could think that all of the above doesn’t make any sense. But let’s take a closer look at those setups.

It may seem a T3 cruiser fleet, being cruisers have an unfavorable hitpoint/damage ratios. But the T3 cruisers are a bit of an exception to this rule. Common fits of these ships are actually fairly tanky. Their tank has usually less raw HP than their battleship counterparts around 50,000 HP, but when fit with shiny faction armor plates and hardeners they can quickly go to 100 to 150.000 HP, combined with a small signature (which gives good damage mitigation) and these cruisers become harder to kill than most battleships. Comparatively, their DPS usually ranges somewhere from 500 to 800 (quite close to that of a battleship). Taking this in, they are actually more suited for the job than they may seem at the first sight. Of course, a well fit T3 cruiser can be a lot more expensive than a fit battleship, but in exchange for that value, the pilot gets some well-needed maneuverability.

T3 destroyers follow a similar pattern. For example, a fleet fit jackdaw often has DPS  between 150 and 250, their tanking capability close to 20.000 EHP. With a damage ratio of 100:1 this is actually pretty close to the ratio of battleships. When adding defensive mode, a 70 km engagement range, and a small signature, these ships are quite durable and a fair choice for a fleet. Not that these ships get anywhere close to battleship tanks, but that isn’t always necessary.

Caracal fleets and many other T1 cruiser fleets for that matter would seem not really suited towards fleet combat. Their damage and tank just don’t hold up in a comparison with battleships.  Let’s be honest they aren’t the greatest ship for large fleet battles. Still, people fly these, because they are often ‘good enough’ for the job. For many fleets, there is no need for expensive ships. Why risk a 25 billion battleship fleet, if  2 billion in caracals get the job done? They are fast, flexible, but also expendable. But when the important objectives are being contested, most FC’s will probably prefer a sturdier fleet.

In conlusion, larger ships with high hitpoint/damage ratio’s make battles slower, which is generally favorable for fleet combats, as it’s more forgiving when fighting with a delay. In solo PVP, these factors don’t matter, which favors the speed and ease, of engagement, of smaller ships.

 

 

In the next article “Molding the Meta – Part 2 Speed vs power” we will take a quick look at the selection of ships for specific situations.

485 Comments

  1. I have been exploring for a bit for any high-quality articles or blog posts in this sort of area . Exploring in Yahoo I ultimately stumbled upon this web site. Reading this info So i¡¦m glad to express that I have an incredibly just right uncanny feeling I found out just what I needed. I such a lot undoubtedly will make sure to don¡¦t put out of your mind this site and give it a look regularly.

    November 24, 2018 at 00:05 Reply
  2. Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it. Look advanced to far added agreeable from you! However, how could we communicate?

    November 24, 2018 at 19:52 Reply
  3. I am very happy to read this. This is the kind of manual that needs to be given and not the accidental misinformation that is at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this greatest doc.

    November 24, 2018 at 19:52 Reply
  4. Hello there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it’s truly informative. I’m going to watch out for brussels. I’ll be grateful if you continue this in future. A lot of people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

    November 25, 2018 at 02:33 Reply
  5. Keep functioning ,fantastic job!

    November 25, 2018 at 02:33 Reply
  6. I would like to thnkx for the efforts you’ve put in writing this site. I’m hoping the same high-grade site post from you in the upcoming as well. Actually your creative writing skills has inspired me to get my own site now. Really the blogging is spreading its wings quickly. Your write up is a good example of it.

    November 25, 2018 at 02:34 Reply
  7. you are in reality a excellent webmaster. The site loading velocity is incredible. It kind of feels that you’re doing any distinctive trick. Also, The contents are masterpiece. you have done a wonderful task on this topic!

    November 25, 2018 at 02:38 Reply
  8. I allow it perform this’s factor for 24 hours without sleeping on that allowing it to fill out as well as expand after being rolled up, as was proposed.

    November 26, 2018 at 13:33 Reply
  9. I really wanted to type a quick word to be able to express gratitude to you for all the awesome guidelines you are placing at this website. My extensive internet investigation has finally been paid with reliable information to share with my neighbours. I would declare that most of us visitors actually are definitely lucky to dwell in a good website with so many outstanding people with beneficial tips and hints. I feel somewhat fortunate to have come across the weblog and look forward to many more cool minutes reading here. Thanks once more for everything.

    November 27, 2018 at 04:30 Reply
  10. Wow, incredible weblog layout! How lengthy have you ever been running a blog for? you made blogging look easy. The whole look of your site is magnificent, let alone the content!

    November 27, 2018 at 23:49 Reply
  11. Hello very nice website!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I’ll bookmark your blog and take the feeds additionally¡KI am satisfied to find numerous helpful info right here in the publish, we want work out more strategies in this regard, thank you for sharing. . . . . .

    November 27, 2018 at 23:50 Reply
  12. Good website! I truly love how it is easy on my eyes and the data are well written. I am wondering how I could be notified whenever a new post has been made. I have subscribed to your RSS feed which must do the trick! Have a great day!

    November 27, 2018 at 23:50 Reply
  13. Hello.This post was really remarkable, especially because I was browsing for thoughts on this topic last week.

    November 28, 2018 at 00:05 Reply
  14. Only time will certainly say to that, however they are actually starting out to appear actually properly brought in. They are actually relaxed for 2 70-somethings, however they are not as well smooth either.

    November 28, 2018 at 18:41 Reply
  15. It¡¦s actually a nice and useful piece of info. I am glad that you just shared this useful information with us. Please stay us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

    November 29, 2018 at 02:40 Reply
  16. I have been surfing on-line more than three hours nowadays, but I by no means found any attention-grabbing article like yours. It¡¦s beautiful worth enough for me. In my view, if all web owners and bloggers made just right content material as you did, the net might be a lot more useful than ever before.

    November 29, 2018 at 02:53 Reply
  17. This is really interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger. I’ve joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your wonderful post. Also, I’ve shared your website in my social networks!

    November 29, 2018 at 03:18 Reply
  18. Great tremendous things here. I¡¦m very satisfied to peer your post. Thank you a lot and i’m having a look forward to contact you. Will you please drop me a mail?

    November 29, 2018 at 03:18 Reply
  19. I just couldn’t go away your website before suggesting that I really enjoyed the usual information a person supply in your visitors? Is going to be again incessantly to inspect new posts

    December 6, 2018 at 05:21 Reply
  20. Hello there, I discovered your website by means of Google whilst searching for a similar matter, your site came up, it appears to be like good. I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

    December 6, 2018 at 05:31 Reply
  21. Hello.This article was really remarkable, particularly since I was looking for thoughts on this topic last Sunday.

    December 6, 2018 at 05:48 Reply
  22. Nice blog right here! Additionally your site so much up fast! What web host are you the usage of? Can I am getting your associate link in your host? I desire my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

    December 6, 2018 at 05:51 Reply
  23. I would like to show my appreciation to you just for rescuing me from such a scenario. After browsing throughout the world-wide-web and coming across ways that were not helpful, I figured my entire life was gone. Existing without the approaches to the problems you have fixed by way of this review is a crucial case, and the ones which may have negatively affected my entire career if I hadn’t encountered your blog. Your personal talents and kindness in maneuvering everything was helpful. I don’t know what I would’ve done if I had not encountered such a stuff like this. I’m able to at this moment relish my future. Thanks a lot very much for this skilled and sensible help. I will not think twice to endorse your web sites to anyone who requires tips about this issue.

    December 9, 2018 at 02:56 Reply
  24. Hello. magnificent job. I did not anticipate this. This is a great story. Thanks!

    December 9, 2018 at 02:57 Reply
  25. Thanks for sharing superb informations. Your site is very cool. I am impressed by the details that you¡¦ve on this site. It reveals how nicely you perceive this subject. Bookmarked this web page, will come back for extra articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found simply the information I already searched all over the place and just couldn’t come across. What an ideal site.

    December 9, 2018 at 03:01 Reply
  26. fantastic points altogether, you just gained a emblem new reader. What may you suggest in regards to your submit that you just made a few days ago? Any sure?

    December 9, 2018 at 03:05 Reply
  27. Thanks for your entire labor on this web site. Ellie enjoys conducting research and it’s really easy to understand why. My partner and i know all of the powerful means you provide reliable steps through the web site and as well improve response from people on the article plus my child is without question being taught a great deal. Take pleasure in the remaining portion of the year. You have been performing a remarkable job.

    December 9, 2018 at 03:22 Reply
  28. I am also writing to make you understand of the amazing encounter my cousin’s princess found viewing your site. She even learned plenty of issues, with the inclusion of how it is like to have an excellent teaching mood to get a number of people clearly thoroughly grasp several complicated matters. You actually exceeded people’s desires. I appreciate you for imparting those practical, safe, explanatory and as well as fun tips about the topic to Julie.

    December 10, 2018 at 14:12 Reply
  29. Hey, you used to write excellent, but the last several posts have been kinda boring¡K I miss your super writings. Past few posts are just a little out of track! come on!

    December 11, 2018 at 09:48 Reply
  30. Wonderful goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you are just too wonderful. I really like what you’ve acquired here, certainly like what you’re stating and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still take care of to keep it smart. I can not wait to read much more from you. This is actually a great site.

    December 13, 2018 at 00:36 Reply
  31. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this topic to be really something that I think I would never understand. It seems too complicated and extremely broad for me. I am looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

    December 13, 2018 at 00:37 Reply
  32. Wow! Thank you! I continually wanted to write on my website something like that. Can I implement a part of your post to my blog?

    December 13, 2018 at 00:42 Reply
  33. Whats Going down i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I have discovered It positively useful and it has aided me out loads. I hope to give a contribution & aid different customers like its aided me. Good job.

    December 13, 2018 at 09:43 Reply
  34. Great awesome issues here. I¡¦m very glad to see your article. Thank you so much and i’m having a look ahead to contact you. Will you kindly drop me a mail?

    December 13, 2018 at 09:44 Reply

Leave a Reply