Comments on: The Nosy Gamer: Intrade For Eve?

By: Zane Rosario

Zane Rosario — Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:20:41 +0000

Maybe even turn over insurance to player corps. Or something kooky like that. I still fall back on a player run Court of Interstellar Justice with elected jurists and space lawyer professions. Let the sandbox expand CCP.

By: neweco

neweco — Fri, 12 Oct 2012 11:16:48 +0000

Something people always neglect is, that EVE has nearly nil demand for money creation (destruction= beside the action driven sources (and sinks). You could in theory swap this system to central bank based fiat-money system and create further money through bank-credits, BUT for this you need CREDIBILITY. the problem is, the player who have sufficient credIbility do not need money. In fact the players like Chribba rather look for investment opportunities. The players that would need money lack the credibility (in most cases, with the exception of monitarizable collaterals). Same is valid for larger entities (corps and alliances). Thus stock market is nice to think of but void any use but scamming.

By: Gumpin

Gumpin — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:03:29 +0000

Someone google this man EVE BANK HEIST

By: Guesty

Guesty — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:21:49 +0000

This doesn't have any potential to be manipulated at all!!! Foolproof

By: Crav

Crav — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:54:52 +0000

iT is not possible to hold any character accountable for its actions in EVE on-line. How does CCP expect to regulate anything in these conditions?

By: zzz

zzz — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 07:57:29 +0000

see how nobody gives a shit about the best incursion farmers?

By: zzz

zzz — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 07:56:48 +0000

titan-backed securities

By: Ambrose Newsome

Ambrose Newsome — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 07:08:29 +0000

In eve its all too easy to take the money and run. This was discussed many times on forums, fanfests, etc… Basically without changing lots of things that would turn eve into a different game, its not possible to do.

By: DarthNefarius

DarthNefarius — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 05:57:10 +0000

CRY HAVOC & LET LOOSE THE INTERNET SPACESHIP ATTORNIES :S

By: NRDS_4life

NRDS_4life — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 05:33:07 +0000

A- Stocks should be corp based not alliance based
B- Stocks should reflect the amount of profit / dividends distributed to share holders
C- It shouldn't encourage alliances to merge into others / blue ball each others.. because that would kill the game

By: BntyHunter

BntyHunter — Wed, 10 Oct 2012 22:53:33 +0000

Awesome I would be able to bet on fights when my spy toon knows fleet comp and we are only outmatched 2.5 to 1 ……..We better get odds on that, Id bet 10 bil if GSF esp DBRB r 100 bil and a texticle if Zagdul is FCing if tey had 250 Drakes and us in 100 Naga`s Hacs Rokhs Hercocats…..Hell anything

By: Alifikduzimir

Alifikduzimir — Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:27:31 +0000

The whole idea of a more fleshed out shares system, stock market, derivatives, etc. fails on the basic requirement of accountability. In eve its all too easy to take the money and run. This was discussed many times on forums, fanfests, etc… Basically without changing lots of things that would turn eve into a different game, its not possible to do.

By: Dev

Dev — Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:34:15 +0000

Our corp pay dividends since 2011.

By: EN24 Requires a Name

EN24 Requires a Name — Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:35:38 +0000

Do not foget PL's super cap fleet or GGLords =P

By: Iamien

Iamien — Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:18:24 +0000

TEST/Tribe/Test friends = Zerglings. PL = Infestors, Other HBC alliances=(other units)

EVE has no supply cap.